Then

Then

Review the old frog story...and apply it !!!!

“If you place a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will immediately try to scramble out. But if you place the frog in room temperature water, and don't scare him, he'll stay put. Now, if the pot sits on a heat source, and if you gradually turn up the temperature, something very interesting happens. As the temperature rises from 70 to 80 degrees F., the frog will do nothing. In fact, he will show every sign of enjoying himself. As the temperature gradually increases, the frog will become groggier and groggier, until he is unable to climb out of the pot. Though there is nothing restraining him, the frog will sit there and boil.

 Why? Because the frog's internal apparatus for sensing threats to survival is geared to sudden changes in his environment, not to slow, gradual changes”.  If the following facts don't rattle your brain you might want to see a doctor.

            ALL Of A Sudden....Seven Short Years Have Passed! 

Before Obama, There was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America. .

• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the Bible are banned in schools.

• All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports, and businesses.

• All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons.

• All of a sudden we are inundated with lawsuits by Muslims who are offended by American culture.

• All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who or what is covered up under them.

• All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.

• All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in 'anti-Muslim speech'.

• All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like 'workplace violence."

• All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

• All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS .

• All of a sudden, America has reduced its nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama's stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.

• All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.

• All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war, and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.

• All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels Of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter. A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.

• All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East .

• All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states. He demands to close the facility.

• All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.

• All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama's "Syrian refugee" resettlement Programs.

• All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA .

• All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is disarm American citizens.

• All of a sudden, the President of the United States cannot attend the Christian funerals of a Supreme Court Justice and a former First Lady because of previous (seemingly unimportant) commitments.

Any doubts about the wimpy closet Muslim in the Oval Office???

A thought to be remembered,..that needs to be.

 Karl Marx said, "Remove one freedom per generation and soon you will have no freedom and no one would have noticed."  
                                             
                                                   WILD PIGs
 
Between Obama and his self destructing ObamaCare, his dying loss of world respect, the cancerous growth of Islamic Terrorism,  the deterioration of our cities and the huge growth of the poverished.....we do not have enough broadband to enumerate the horrors of his, Bernie's and Hillary's future for American.
F.
 
There was a chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class.
 
One day, the professor noticed one young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt. The professor asked the young man what was the matter.

 The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist regime. In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question.
 
He asked: "Do you know how to catch wild pigs?"

 The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke. "You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free corn.
 
"When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence.
 
"They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side.
 
"The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat that free corn again. You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.
 
Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity."
 
The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening in America . The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare entitlements, medicine, drugs, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time.
 
One should always remember two truths: There is no such thing as a free lunch, and you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself.

If you see that all of this wonderful government "help" is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America , you might want to share this with your friends.

If you think the free ride is essential to your way of life, then you will probably not share this. BUT, God help us all when the gate slams shut!

Quote for today: "The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are now outnumbered."

A dose of reality . . .

 Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of the conservative black think tank, Project 21-The National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives and a former member of its parent think tank, the National Center for Public Policy Research.

Trump is not a Liberal or Conservative, He’s a Pragmatist.
(Definition: A pragmatist is someone who is practical and focused on reaching a goal. A pragmatist usually has a straightforward, matter-of-fact approach and doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)

"We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation was jocund, ranging from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics. At one point, reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative, nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative.  

It was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative; he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.

Viewing problems from a liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.

Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending and globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the ass of the Democrat Party.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem – it isn't a liberal problem – it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach, not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy isn't a liberal or conservative problem; it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.

Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work; they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that China’s manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it. Here again, successful businessmen like Trump who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work, and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 per hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at Carl’s Hamburgers.

I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason people do not like him is because: (1) he is antithetical to the “good old boy” method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians; (2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a candidate speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who owe them vis-a-vis donations; (3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology; and (4) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to “out crazy” one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it, but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist might be just what America needs right now.

People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solved a problem, because it's better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved," so re-elect me to solve it, (which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success.

Donald Trump has his total financial empire at risk in running for president; that says it all. “Success for the U.S.A.!”


Why republicans want voter ID

Wonder why Republicans want voter ID ? Intriguing facts.I thought you might find this interesting. I sure did!

Next time you hear Hillary, or any other Democrat, ranting about Republicans wanting to disenfranchise minorities by requiring voter ID, keep the following in mind:

* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).

* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters .

* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.

* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.

* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout .

* In one Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters .

NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every
state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote .
Imagine that.....

ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET OR WHAT ?

Am I crazy or what ???!!!

See if this article doesn't drive you a little bit nutz!!!
The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual Resource Center at the University of California Davis warns that some “words hurt” — including the expression “you guys.”

That common phrase is among a list of “Words that Hurt” detailed on the public university’swebsite. The expression “hurts” because it “erases the identities of people who are in the room” and “generalizing a group of people to be masculine,” the website states.


Full story:   Click HERE

FBI Director James Comey is not a stupid guy.

Makes sense to me.
F.

FBI Director James Comey is not a stupid guy. He may have been
directed to "take the fall" with his Hillary announcement (we know that Loretta didn't want this thrown on her desk to preside over, even though the FBI has no authority to make decisions whether or not to prosecute crimes; they only investigate and Justice Dept decides that). However, he decided to do something out of the ordinary -- lay out and disclose all of his evidence during his Press Conference. He knew what he was doing and he knew that it would create a "firestorm" of controversy. If he had just sent everything he had to AG Lynch, it might have all gotten buried or, at least, not disclosed until long after the election. Instead, he threw it all out for the public to know.

Read full article  Click HERE


From our mailbag

From our Richland, WA Correspondent, John Deichman:  

Fred,
I'm not sending this to blast Hillary for giving a speech about inequality, while wearing a $12,500 Armani jacket.

I'm posting this to show respect for Armani, for being an excellent example of capitalism and being able to sell a potato sack with sleeves to a corrupt socialist for $12,500, which in this case, holds about 180 pounds of BS!
J.

COMING SOON TO YOUR OVAL OFFICE !!!!!











AND FINALLY....FOR YOUR DEMOCRAT FRIENDS------


A thought from today's mailbag....

From our Georgia Correspondent....Ozzie..

Fred

I was just thinking ---- Not long ago GM was building cars in Flint, Michigan and you couldn't
drink the water in Mexico..

After 7 years under the Obama  Administration, GM now builds cars in Mexico and you can't drink the water in Flint, Michigan.

Hope and Change delivered!
Is this a great country or what?

When Is a Ransom Not a Ransom? When It’s Inconvenient to Call It That

A pay-off that does all the damage of a ransom payment isn’t any better, no matter what you call it.

An all-time favorite line from Henry Thoreau: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”

 It came to mind this week when the White House and State Department insisted that the charge the U.S. paid a ransom to get back American hostages was purely circumstantial. Sometimes, a $400 million pay-off in laundered money, delivered in the dead of night in an unmarked cargo plane isn’t what it looks like. ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW STUPID OBAMA THINKS YOUR ARE..!!!  
READ THE FULL STORY CLICKING  HERE

Five questions for Hillary----

Hillary Clinton goes to a gifted-student primary school in New York to talk about the world. After her talk she offers question time.

ne little boy puts up his hand. Hillary asks him what his name is. "Kenneth," he says. "And what is your question, Kenneth?" she asks.

"I have three questions," he says.
"First -- whatever happened in Benghazi?
"Second -- why would you run for president if you are not capable of handling two e-mail accounts?
"And, third -- whatever happened to the missing six billion dollars while you were Secretary of State?"

Just then the bell rings for recess. Hillary informs the kiddies that they will continue after recess.

When they resume Hillary says, "Okay, where were we? Oh, that's right, question time.
Who has a question?"

A different boy -- little Johnny -- puts his hand up.
Hillary points to him and asks him what his name is.
"Johnny," he says.

"And what is your question, Johnny?" she asks.

"I have five questions," he says.
"First -- whatever happened in Benghazi ?
"Second -- why would you run for president if you are not capable of handling two e-mail accounts?
"Third -- whatever happened to the missing six billion dollars while you were Secretary of

 State? 
"Fourth -- why did the recess bell go off 20 minutes early?
"And, fifth -- where's Kenneth?"

Retarded USA voter laws.

Mexico, a Country overrun with corruption and crime, yet theyare smarter then the dipshits we now have in Washington !! 

  

Allen West's reply to the Gold Star father, K. Khan....

By Allen West July 31, 2016

Everyone’s talking about the speech delivered by Mr. Khizr Khan, accompanied by his wife Ghazala at the DNC that focused on the loss of his son, U.S. Army Captain Humayan Khan.It appears things have devolved into such a level of immaturity relating to the speech that I believe there’s a need for a clear analysis of Mr. Khan’s address, and what he should have presented.

First, let me offer my condolences to the Khan family for their sacrifice, as they are now an American Gold Star Family. Their son and I share an unbreakable bond. We both served our nation and, along with three other generations in my family, took the oath to support and defend our Constitution and served in combat zones.

Yes sir, Mr. Khan, I’ve read our Constitution and firmly recognize the preeminent responsibility of our federal government is to “provide for the common defense.” I also comprehend the relationship between the three branches of government…you know separation of powers, checks and balances, coequal branches of government.

I would offer a simple recommendation to Mr. Khan. Perhaps you should have asked President Barack Obama if he had read the Constitution — undoubtedly you would agree we have witnessed a few unconstitutional actions from him.

And while you were at it, Mr. Khan, perhaps you could have asked Hillary Clinton about handling classified information — since I’m quite sure your son, Captain Khan, had at a minimum a secret clearance.

I don’t think your son would have been able to, well, have his “careless” mishandling of classified materials and information simply excused. Perhaps Mr. Khan, you could have addressed the necessity for high standards of honor, integrity, and character in a commander in chief.
Also, I found it interesting Mr. Khan, that you and your wife, an American Gold Star family, would take the stage to support a sitting president and one desiring to be president, who had abandoned Americans in a combat zone and lied about it.

I tend to believe that if alive, your son would consider that type of behavior abhorrent and deplorable. Or perhaps, as it seems, your speech was politically driven, and not based on principle? After all, you did take the stage before a crowd that disrespected a Medal of Honor recipient…is that cool with you?

You see, I understand Mr. Khan, that your son and your family are Muslim and Muslims do indeed serve in our armed forces. But in the military I know, we do not celebrate that which divides, but rather that which unites. And what is it that unites us as Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines? It is service above self, commitment to something greater than the individual, and sacrifice for our country and comrades in arms.

Now, let’s be honest Mr. Khan, those of us with knowledge could just as easily bring attention to SGT Hasan Karim Akbar and Major Nidal Hasan, both Muslims serving in the U.S. Army. Just as you celebrated your Muslim son’s sacrifice, there are others who could give testimony to their loss due to those Muslim soldiers — and I use lower case reference to them (soldiers) because they dishonored the oath and were traitors to our Code of Honor. Your son was not, but that had nothing to do with him being a Muslim: he was an American Soldier.

So, Mr. Khan, since you had such an immense stage, what should you have addressed? You should have taken the time to explain how humbled and thankful you are to live in America. You should have mentioned how honored your son was and the pride you felt knowing he was serving your adopted country. You should have explained to America, and the world, what killed your son…the ideology of Islamism, Islamic fascism.

You could have told all of us why it needed to be defeated and that we need a commander in chief who would not abandon Americans in combat, but ensure they were supported in order to defeat this scourge.

Mr. Khan, you could have taken these words spoken by a proven courageous and resilient leader, Sir Winston Churchill, who has a U.S. Naval vessel named after him, and expounded upon them:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
And now we can all understand why Barack Obama had Churchill’s bust removed from the Oval Office.

Those were the insightful, prescient, and relevant words of Sir Winston Churchill from the first edition of his book, The River War.

Mr. Khan, this is what you should have addressed; it would have been so very well received. You could have told the world and defined the enemy that killed your son…instead my assessment is that you will be remembered as a political pawn.

You could have taken the time to explain the words written by Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, dated March 28, 1786, to U.S. Minister of Foreign Affairs John Jay, reporting on their meeting with the Ambassador of Tripoli:


“We [Adams & Jefferson] took the liberty to make some enquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. [Note they clarify “nations who have done them [i.e. Muslim Barbary States] no injury”] The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their prophet [i.e. Mohammed]; that it was written in their Koran; that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Mussulman [Muslims] who was slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Mr. Khan, you had a moment to speak on history and provide us clarity and truth from a Muslim man who lost his son, an American Soldier, to Islamists. You could have clarified the difference between your son and SGT Hasan Karim Akbar and Major Nidal Hasan. That sir, to me, was a missed opportunity.

Then again, maybe you had no intention of using the platform provided to you as a teachable moment…but rather a politically-influenced opportunity for gain.

You, Mr. Khan, had the chance to be the face and voice of a Muslim family that stood with the fundamental principles and values of liberty, freedom, and democracy upon which this Republic was founded — in which you have found a home.

You could have articulated how a 7th century savage and barbaric ideology inspired by a murderous warlord, psychopath, and, by modern day standards, a pedophile, was not a radical but the leader of a militant phase of Islam introduced after the 622 AD event referred to as Al Hijra.

Mr. Khan, I grieve for the loss of your son. However, I grieve even more that you used his sacrifice and loss as nothing more than a damn politicized stunt. May God forgive you for it.

The Democratic Convention was an exercise in absurdist theater

 VICTOR DAVIS HANSON, August 2, 2016 .

 Donald Trump, to the degree he is coherent, wants Americans to think the following of the Obama administration, the Clinton candidacy, and the entire progressive enterprise. His three-part writ could be summed up as follows:

: 1) Obama has doubled the national debt in just eight years. He has abdicated U.S. leadership abroad, was taken for a patsy by duplicitous trade partners, has deliberately divided races and tribes at home for transient political advantage, has nationalized health care into a mess, has overregulated and overtaxed the economy into near-zero-growth stasis, and has whitewashed all of the above with upbeat banalities about hope and change.

 2) During Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, the Obama administration oversaw the destruction of the modern Middle East, ignored the rise of ISIS, engineered a failed reset that empowered Putin’s Russia, let China systematize unfair and injurious trade practices that fuel an aggressive foreign policy, and alienated traditional friends while courting longstanding enemies. Clinton’s record of government service is one of decades of prevarication, malfeasance, and corruption.

 3) Progressivism is a euphemism for a grievance-based agenda with mandated equality of result. An incompetent, uncaring, and always larger government is its agency — a project that demands constant tax increases and ever-greater social spending. It seeks to divide the country up by identity groups, politicize the bureaucracies, and ignore the old working classes, especially the white lower middle class.

To read the rest of Victor's article, which is, as usual, insightful and penetrating 
CLICK HERE  

A couple smiles from Joe.



With Trump the good news is, that at worst, nothing will get worse....


With Hillary.....the current road to bankruptcy, the internatonal wreckage left behind by Obama and Clinton and the birth defects in the Constitution that will  become infected by Clinton could scuttle our Democracy for generation.
F.

Politics is a nasty business. Every couple years we are reminded just how far down in the gutter the two main party candidates will go. The attack ads and language hurled across the aisle regularly make the news as ‘the new low’. But not every candidate stoops to that level. Gary Johnson and Bill Weld (Libertarions) are not going to be engaging in those types of attacks. Their criticisms are going to be reasoned and substantive. Although, that doesn’t mean they can’t be hard-hitting at the same time. Gary Johnson summed up Hillary Clinton in four words: “she is the establishment”.

As Johnson went on to explain in this short clip from a much longer Reason interview, nothing will change if Hillary is elected President. Well, not nothing. What is meant by that is that nothing will change for the better.
The establishment will roll on unhindered. The change that libertarians want to see will not happen but rather the opposite. Government will get bigger instead of smaller and it will “try to do more”. The ‘government is the solution’ attitude of the past eight years will only get worse. There will be changes to the system that make it more intrusive in our lives instead of less.


From someone who was there....

How many idiot does to that to elect her???

To all my small minded friends...both Democrat and Republican......

Please watch and listen to the speech...very short segment, of Barack Obamas words to our European friends.  In other words:..."You are too frigging stupid to have any effect on your own life, your own decisions, your  care of yourselves or your family or your business.  This incompetent, untested, inexpeienced butthead wants to tell you how to live and how to pursue happiness  promised in the Constitution.

This brief snippet is a perfect example of what you must  expect from this
piece of socialist/Muslim crap that stumbled into our Presidency by appealing to the uninformed, the dependent and those that want some of all that free shit Democrats promise.

SOME WORTHWHILE THOUGHTS ON GUN CONTROL IN AMERICA.

 When I was in college at University of Illinois I was surrounded in the fraternity by a unusual number of brothers in Math and Sciences, Accounting, etc.  It seemed that the most bitched about courses they were taking always had Statistics as the forerunner in disliked required courses.  Numbers can be dry compared to history or marketing.  However, if you would like to get a few hours of extra credit in Statistics, the informative article below which will do it...and thanks to Corresponent Joe Rhodes, (a graduate accountant) for sending it to his political buddies.
 
It pretty well hits the nail head and vividly displays the obvious bullshit flowing from the Obama office of incompetence.  It is no wonder that he has wrecked major portions of our nation by focusing in insignificant elements and ignoring major challenges such as preserving the greatness of our nation.
F.

       Very Interesting Facts About Gun Control:

 There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms. That is not disputed. (US Population324,059,091 as of Wednesday, June 22, 2016)  (Do the math - 0.0000925% of the population die from gun related actions each year - statically speaking it is insignificant!)

 What is never shown, though, is a breakdown of those deaths to put them in perspective; as compared to other causes of death.
 •    65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws
 •    15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified
 •    17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons
 •    3% are accidental discharge deaths
 So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually but drops to 5,100.
 
 Still too many?  Well, first, how are those deaths spanned across the nation?
 •    480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
 •    344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
 •    333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
 •    119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington DC (a 54% increase over prior years)

 So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.

  All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.

 This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation or about 75 per state.

 That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others.   For example, California had 1,169. Alabama had 1.

 Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far?  California of course but understand, it is not the tool (guns) driving this.  It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equal, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.

 Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific?
 How about in comparison to other deaths?

 All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime.  Robbery, death, rape, assault; all are done by criminals to victims and thinking that criminals will obey laws is ludicrous. That's why they are criminals.

 But what of other deaths?
 •    40,000+ die from a drug overdose – THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
 ·    36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths
 •    34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities (exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide)

 Now it gets good
 •    200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical malpractice.
 •   You are safer in Chicago than you are in a hospital!
 •    710,000 people die per year from heart disease.  Time to stop the cheeseburgers!

 So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10%  decrease would save twice the lives annually of all gun related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.).

 A 10% reduction in malpractice would be 66% of the total gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides.  Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions!

 So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of

things, why the focus on guns?
 It's pretty simple.   Taking away guns gives control to governments. This is not conspiracy theory; this is a historical fact.

 Why is it impossible for the government to spill over into dictatorship?
 Why did the Japanese not even attempt to attack California in WWII?
 Because as they put it, there is a gun behind every blade of grass.
 The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did.
 They too tried to disarm the populace of the colonies
because it is not difficult to understand; a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
 Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the Constitution.
 It must be preserved at all costs.

 So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster:
 "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed";  as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

 The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.

 A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power."

 Another comment:
 Please note that this explanation doesn’t address anything about the deaths being PREVENTED by someone having a gun in defense of their person or property – and it is many times the number of deaths CAUSED by guns.  Such is the deterrent effect of gun ownership as well as the many cases of the immediate removal of a bad person from being able to cause injury or death to another person.

 Remember:  “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away…”         
 (Average police response time: 6 minutes)

 If you even slightly agree, pass it on.
 If you disagree then use your delete key now.  (It will not change the facts, but it will make you feel better as you drink your kool-aid.)

Clinton Tell-All Book Author Has A Message About Hillary Democrats Will Hate

When Donald Trump finally took the stage at the Republican National Convention to accept the party’s nomination for president Thursday night, one of his first references to Hillary Clinton came when he branded her a “world class liar.”


Dolly Kyle could agree more than most.

In an interview with "The Point" at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Kyle, the author of a book describing her own decades-long sexual affair with Bill Clinton, had a message about Hillary that all American voters – especially Democratic voters – need to hear.

“I believe Hillary is cognitively impaired,” Kyle told The Point. “I know that she’s been a pathological liar for 40 years, and she can’t tell the truth from fiction. Because she believes her own lies.

“The problem in Benghazi is one of these things. She cannot, she absolutely cannot function in an emergency situation,” Kyle said, “and she cannot properly plan for something.”

Since that basically describes the job of president, that should spell problems for a woman seeking the most powerful office on earth – and her supporters.

Kyle’s book, “Hillary: The Other Woman: A Political Memoir” details a lifelong relationship with the Clintons that started when Kyle was 11 and young “Billy” Clinton was 12. In the book, Kyle maintains her relationship with Billy remained sexual through the years, even when both were married to other people.

That gave her a unique perspective on the power couple of Democrat politics – especially Hillary.

“Hillary has been going around, cleaning up after Billy, all these many decades,” she said. “They can’t tell the truth about anything.”

During the interview, Kyle described the first time she met Hillary with Bill Clinton back in 1974. It might have been the only time Hillary was “genuine,” she said. And the description was not complimentary. “The woman was so odious-looking and smelling, I thought it was a joke.”

But what really compelled her to write the book, she said, was seeing a Hillary Clinton television advertisement in December where the former first lady and secretary of state declared that any woman who claimed to have been raped or sexually abused deserved to be believed.

“It made me so angry, I wanted to throw a shoe at the television screen,” she said. “Support them unless the rapist and sex abuser was her husband, Billy Clinton, whose coattails she was busy riding to the White House.”

While it might have made her angry, it also gave Kyle a clue to just how deeply she thinks Hillary is disconnected from reality. In her book, she lists symptoms of cognitive impairment as presented by the Centers for Disease Control and compares them to Hillary’s actions and words throughout her life.

“It lines up, boom, boom, boom, boom,” she said.

And that’s the message she wants to get to Americans, even the Democrat delegates and super delegates who will be at next week’s Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. If they knew the truth about Hillary, she said, they wouldn’t make her the party’s nominee for the 2016 election.

“Something is seriously wrong with her …. Mentally,” Kyle said. “And I think that would give the super delegates an out, an easy, non-political out, to say this woman is not mentally capable of being the president of the United States, having her finger on the nuclear trigger.”

That’s a sharp contrast to the public image generally associated with Hillary – the wonkish work horse who was plugging away at policy while Bill partied – but that’s exactly Kyle’s point. The title of her book – “Hillary: The Other Woman” was more than a play on words generally describing her adulterous affair with Bill Clinton, Kyle said. To Kyle, it was an apt description of Hillary herself.

“She is not the woman most people think she is,” Kyle told The Point at the end of the interview. “She is absolutely an other woman, and we would get that other person in the White House.

“I think it’s real important to spread that word.”

Secretary of Sleaze It is a matter of character! Great lesson here!

This should be the standard that all politicians, judges. lawyers and people in high responsible positions should be held to. It should definitely be the standard for our leaders; no exceptions, regardless of their gender, race or anything else.
Phillip Jennings is an investment banker and entrepreneur, former Marine Corps Captain who flew missions in Vietnam and, after leaving the Marine Corps, flew for Air America in Laos. He won the Pirate's Alley Faulkner Society short fiction award in 1998. He has a degree in business administration and is the CEO of Mayfair Capital Partners. He is the author of two novels and one non-fiction book.

He authored the following article which appeared in the May 26, 2016 edition of USA Today. It is short and should be required reading for everyone.


Secretary without honor.

When I hear people say Clinton emails don't matter, I remember a young Marine captain who owned up to his career-ruining mistake.

Apologists for Hillary Clinton's alleged criminal mishandling of classified documents say that it doesn't matter, that she really did nothing wrong, or nothing significant. But the real question is not so much what she did as how she has responded to being found out.

Once during the mid-1960s when I was on active duty in the Marine Corps, I was the air liaison officer for a battalion of Marines aboard 11 ships in the Mediterranean. As the air officer and a senior captain, I had a rotating responsibility for the nuclear code book, kept in the safe in the operations room of the lead amphibious squadron command ship. I shared that duty with another captain, a squared away young man, liked by all he commanded and the son of a very high-ranking Marine.

On the day our ships were leaving the Mediterranean, we met the new amphibious squadron near Gibraltar and made preparations to transfer security codes and other sensitive material to the incoming Marine battalion. The young captain was on duty and went to the operations office to pick up the code book. He was alone in the office. He removed the code book and placed it on the desk while closing the safe. In a rushed moment, he stepped across the passageway to retrieve something he needed from his quarters. Seconds later, he stepped back into the operations office and found the operations sergeant having just entered, looking down at the code book.

Against all regulations, the code book had been out of the safe and unattended. It mattered not that it was unattended for only seconds, that the ship was 5 miles at sea, or that it was certain no one unauthorized had seen the code. The captain could have explained this to the operations sergeant. He could have told the sergeant that he "would take care of it." He could have hinted that his high-ranking dad could smooth it over.

But the Marine Corps' values are honor, courage and commitment. Honor is the bedrock of our character. The young captain could not ask the sergeant to betray his duty to report the infraction, no matter how small. Instead, the captain simply said, "Let's go see the colonel."

That captain had wanted to be a Marine officer all of his life. It was the only career he ever wanted. When he reported the incident to the colonel, he knew he was jeopardizing his life's dream. But he did it.

The results went by the book. The amphibious squadron stood down. Military couriers flew in from NATO. The codes were changed all over Europe. The battalion was a day late in leaving the Mediterranean. The captain, Leonard F. Chapman III, received a letter of reprimand, damaging his career. He stayed in the corps and died in a tragic accident aboard another ship. [For those interested, Captain Chapman's father was Gen. Leonard F. Chapman Jr., the former Commandant of the Marine Corps.]

I saw some heroic acts in combat in Vietnam, things that made me proud to be an American and a Marine. But that young captain stood for what makes our corps and our country great.

Clinton is the antithesis of that young captain, someone with no honor, little courage and

commitment only to her endless ambition. This has nothing to do with gender, party affiliation, ideology or policy. It is a question of character — not just hers, but ours. Electing Clinton would mean abandoning holding people accountable for grievous errors of integrity and responsibility. What we already know about her security infractions should disqualify her for any government position that deals in information critical to mission success, domestic or foreign. But beyond that, her responses to being found out — dismissing its importance, claiming ignorance, blaming others — indict her beyond anything the investigation can reveal. Those elements reveal her character. And the saddest thing is that so many in America seem not to care.

Let's see if YOU can connect the dots.....Hillary believes you are too stupid to do that !!!!

 Hmmm - This really makes you think.  Can we really believe
 this?   

Well, let's see. Our U.S. Attornery General,Loretta Lynch, was headed to Aspen, Co from Washington DC for a speaking engagement, a distance of around 1500 miles in almost a direct line East to West.

The Government plane in which she was flying was more than likely a G5 with a range of 6500 miles. Question is why she would go to Phoenix, first which is 600 miles South of Aspen, then go North to Aspen from Phoenix. She did not need to stop in Phoenix for fuel because if she would have flown direct, fuel would not be  necessary. In fact, do the math, the G5 has the range to make that round trip without refueling?

Why was Bill waiting for Lynch's plane to land in Phoenix when she was going to Aspen?

That meeting was planned to put the Clinton Fix on and some guy who worked at
 the FBO in Phoenix, called his friend who was an Anchor at the local ABC Station (that is a shocker) and then he verified the meeting with a second independent source at the airport. Ms Lynch said  "They talked for half an hour about grand kids and golf". 
  
 Loretta does not have any grand kids and doesn't play golf!   Bottom Line -                 The Fix was in after this "Chance Meeting"...

It’s election year in the US, so once again we see politicians promising the moon. That’s what happens in a democracy. Regardless of party or office, all politicians make promises in order to get elected. This is their nature. Dogs bark, birds sing, politicians promise.
In the investment business, we’re taught not to make promises because they create liability. Lawyers and compliance officers review documents for “promissory” language. Instead of “This fund will give you a profit,” firms say things that generally sound like “This will give you the opportunity to profit,” thereby avoiding lawsuits and regulatory action when profit proves elusive.
With the Republican convention just concluded and the Democratic convention just ahead, with the presidential candidates making promises by the dozens, let’s imagine what a presidential promise would sound like if it had to comply with the same rules that investment advisors and brokers must adhere to. It would go something like this:
If you elect me as president, I will (insert promise), assuming of course that I can get both houses of Congress to agree, which means of course that I must persuade enough of the opposition Senators to bring my total up to 60 votes in the Senate, assuming that none of my own party votes against me. And that also assumes we can find the money to fulfill this promise, which is unlikely without some real (and unlikely) compromises.

Would-be elected officials face no such restraints, except from voters, who by the next election tend to forget what they were promised. There are exceptions, though. Some political promises don’t fade away. They come back years later and demand fulfillment. Which brings us to the topic for today’s letter: the promises made by politicians concerning public employee pensions.

Chicago residents are learning about this the hard way. They won’t be the only ones. Voters all over the US will pay for the promises their elected officials made long ago – and broke.

Liberals have always managed their promises of constructing a society where all are equally satisfied with everything.  Just ask the folks in Venezuela or Cuba, or Russia. 

What's in a name....

 From our St.Joseph, MI correspondent, Bill Johnson, we got in our
mailbag today a piece that should have you in smiles all day.  Bill picked up on this from a letter that was written to the Chicago Tribune. He sent it to us with confidence that no matter which side you are on in the matter of renaming the Washington  Redskins, this is funny.

 This is an e-mail sent to Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune after an  article he published concerning a name change for the Washington
Redskins.

"Dear Mr. Page:

I agree with our Native American population. I am highly
insulted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins. One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of  political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward.

Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland
Indians. If your shorts are in a w ad because of the reference the name
Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to get rid of the Cleveland
Browns.
 

The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of militant Blacks from the 60's alive. Gone. It's offensive to us white
folk.

The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a team named  for the Confederacy? No! There is no room for any reference to that  tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives.

I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion
among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate to have the New
Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres.

Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and pillaged. 
We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the Minnesota  Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh  Pirates!

Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message to our children. The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits. Wrong message to our  children.

The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a growing  childhood epidemic. Wrong message to our  children
.

The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates. Wrong message to our  children.

The Milwaukee Brewers. Well that goes without saying. Another wrong message  to our  children.
 

So, there you go. We need to support any legislation that comes out to
rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become
involved with this issue, as they should. Just the kind of thing the
do-nothing Congress  love.
 

I always love your articles and I generally agree with them. As for the
Redskins name I would suggest they change the name to the “Foreskins” to  better represent their community, paying tribute to the dick heads in Congress. "

If you have any doubts....

The obvious bottom line of why we have, as a nation, been led down a path to national ridicule.  Obama has refused to even slightly recognize our enemy.  You will not have to spend much time with the accumulation of evidence in the video.   Just connect the dots!


In case you are not paying attention----


The Paris attacks were in November 15. . Easily forgotten is that that same week, Islamists killed Americans in Lebanon, Jordan, the West Bank and Mali.
The San Bernardino attack was December 2.

On New Year’s Day, ISIS rounded up and executed about 300 African migrants in Libya.

The Brussels Suicide Bombers struck March 22.

A car bomb went off in central Istanbul, June 7.

The Orlando attack occurred June 12.

The Istanbul airport attack was June 29. Not many people noticed that one of the people wanted in connection to that attack was once held in Guantanamo Bay and released to Russian authorities in 2004.

The Dhaka, Bangladesh attack was July 1.

And now, Nice, France:

A father and son from Texas and 10 children are among the 84 people murdered Thursday night when a terrorist plowed an explosives- and weapons-laden truck into a crowd of thousands gathered along a seaside promenade in Nice, France, to watch the city’s Bastille Day fireworks.

The driver, who sources identified to Fox News as a 31-year-old Tunisian national, left a mile-long swath of carnage along the seaside walkway before police killed him in a shootout. French authorities did not hestitate to pronounce the attack, which began at 10:40 p.m. local time, an act of terrorism.

“Such a monstrosity,” French President Francois Hollande said Friday morning. “France is deeply saddened, but it is also very strong. I can assure you we will always be stronger than the fanatics who are trying to attack us.”

One site calculates that so far in 2016, there have been 1,268 Islamic attacks in 50 countries, in which 11,664 people were killed and 14,087 injured. Most of these attacks occur in Iraq, Syria, Somalia, and never make the news in the United States.

DO YOU THINK MAYBE IT MIGHT BE TIME TO ELECT A LEADER THAT WILL DO THE JOB OF PROTECTING AND SERVING?  THE CURRENT COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HAS CAUSED THE CURRENT LOSING ATMOSPHERE AND HIS SIDE-KICK WOULD MERELY WALK IN HIS FOOTSTEPS.   GOTTA KEEP HIS LEGACY OF FAILURE ON TARGET..

Australian Prime Minister does it again!!

Prime Minister Julia Gillard - Australia
DON'T YOU WISH OUR NUMB-NUTS PRESIDENT HAD THE BALLS THAT JULIA HAS!!??

Australia says NO -- This will be the second Time Julia Gillard has done this!
She sure isn't backing down on her hard line stance and one has to appreciate her belief in the rights of her native countrymen. A breath of fresh air to see someone lead with guts and determination.  The whole world needs a leader like this!

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks. 

Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.
 Quote: 

'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT... Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.
 

 'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.  We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!

'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.'

 "We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.

'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.

'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE’.We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country that accepted you.' 

The Donald's VP list so far.

Five still in consideration are New Jersey governor Chris Christie, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Alabama senator Jeff Sessions, Indiana governor Mike Pence, former Defense Intelligence Agency director and retired General Michael Flynn. Tennessee senator Bob Corker and Iowa senator Joni Ernst did not complete their forms and publicly withdrew as potential options. Sources say that there may have been other figures sent the forms, but those seven definitely were. For what it’s worth, former Trump staffer Sam Nunberg affirms there are more, but won’t name names.

Flynn seems to be getting a lot of buzz lately; he has a fortuitously timed book about radical Islam coming out.
If you want to talk about a figure who can indict the previous administration with force and credibility, Flynn might be the best pick:
In a sane world, this sort of thing would spur serious impeachment talk:
President Barack Obama’s former top military intelligence official said Tuesday that the White House ignored reports prefacing the rise of ISIS in 2011 and 2012 because they did not fit their re-election “narrative.”
“I think that they did not meet a narrative the White House needed. And I’ll be very candid with you, they just didn’t,” retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “The Lead.”
Flynn, who has been critical of both Obama and former President George W. Bush’s handling of the Iraq War and involvement in the Middle East, said that Obama was served poorly by a small circle of advisers who were worried about his re-election prospects at the time. The story they needed to tell, he said, was that pulling troops from Iraq would not leave the region vulnerable to rise of a radical Islamic group like ISIS.

From the mailbag---


Fred.  With regard to your first paragraphs on the “Choice” piece on your “Corner”---

I was at a graduation celebration for a young lady who will shortly marry my grandson.  I was making conversation with her grandfather and we wandered into politics. He loudly proclaimed he would not vote for Trump because “he was appalled at his language and lack of culture.”  Later  I subsequently found out he was, or had been, a construction worker and steel worker to be exact.  Now, as you know, I am used to Board Room language and as well having heard the best of the renowned vivid construction language when in the field.  I think construction language is more volatile than Trump’s by far  .  Must be a member of the 47% who are looking for an excuse to vote  for a thief, habitional liar and failed Sec. of State to duplicate the USA dip in world leadership.

John D.

WHAT ARE MY CHOICES ??? Serious Business

To my Political Buddies..

Over the Independence Day weekend I had the occasion to discuss some politics with an old friend couple. He is definitly on the sane side of the street as I and his partner was not so sure...stating that she did not care for either Hillary or Donald.  We had tossed down a couple Milagos, so with inhibitions lowered I boldly asked for whom she might vote.  I was fully braced for the vagina inspired embrace but I was determined NOT to discuss the difference between her choices.  It would have been ugly.

I was not prepared for the reply that she would not vote for either!  I probably made no headway in explaining that NOT voting was a vote for Hillary.  I am not going to detail facets of that discussion....but in todays mailbag I received from
Sue, our Fort Myers corespondent, a beautiful piece that might help ANYONE clear up the different aspects of who should lead our country.


The analysis STARTS with the obvious recognition of the disastrous condition our nation has found itself from 8 years with the most incompetent, Keystone Cops, planet- wide stumble bum ever to get inside the Oval Office and a Hillary will merely be a Xerox copy, only worse.
F.

The folks speaking out against Trump are helping me make up my mind a little more every day!
 
 Is he the Perfect Candidate whose thoughts mirrors mine on all fronts? NOPE
 Does he say everything the way I wish he would say it? NOPE
 Am I absolutely sure that his motives are absolutely Pure? NOPE
 Can I point to any other Dem Politician that I like better? NOPE
 Is there any of the other RINO Politicians I like better? NOPE
 Am I going to sit home, refuse to Vote, and let Hillary win; because he is NOT Perfect? NOPE

Do I like the "fundamental changes" that same Jerk has brought about in MY America? NOPE !
 

OK, your turn to decide what you are going to do in about 4 months!

Trump's presidential qualifications…
Obama is against Trump... Check
The Media are against Trump... Check
The establishment Democrats are against Trump... Check
The establishment Republicans are against Trump... Check
The Pope is against Trump... Check
The UN is against Trump... Check
The EU is against Trump... Check
China is against Trump... Check
Mexico is against Trump... Check
Soros is against Trump... Check
Black Lives Matter is against Trump... Check
Move On is against Trump... Check
Koch Brothers are against Trump... Check
Bushes are against Trump ... Check
Planned Parenthood is against Trump....Check
Hillary & Bernie are both against Trump ... Check
Illegal aliens are against Trump ... Check
Islam is against Trump ... Check
Hateful, racist, violent Liberals are against Trump.. Check

NOW THAT BEING SAID...

It seems to me, Trump MUST BE the Best Qualified Candidate we could ever have especially when you have so many political insiders and left wing NUT CASES--- all SCARED TO DEATH, that they all speak out against him at the same time! Most of all, it will be the People's Choice...
PLUS;
He's not a Lifetime Politician...Check
He's not a Lawyer.....Check
He's not doing it for the money...Check
He's a Natural Born American Citizen born in the USA from American parents. .

Bonus points!
Whoopi says she will leave the country...
Rosie says she will leave the country...
Sharpton says he will leave the country...
Cher says she will leave the country...
Cyrus says she will leave the country...
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights will prevail....
Hillary will go to jail.....
The budget will be balanced in 8 years....
Americans will have first choice at jobs.....
You will not be able to marry your pet....
You will be able to keep your gun(s) if you qualify...
(Not a criminal or crazy, etc.)
Only living, registered U.S. citizens can vote....
MUST SHOW ID TO VOTE...
 You can have and keep your own doctor.....
You can say whatever you want without being called a racist, Islamophobic, xenophobic, etc....
 
His goal is to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Come to think of it, we have no place to go, but UP!